Then, Kate, at least half a mile away from prying eyes on
a 640-acre estate in France, was caught sunbathing topless by a photographer
with a larger, telescopic camera. His magazine published the photo. Much
outrage. A more civilized, and sensible, stance soon followed when Kate, on
being welcomed to the Solomon Islands, faced a bevy of women in eye-appealing
native attire - and bare bosoms. But then a photographer was right behind Kate
in Australia to capture the view when a gust of wind blew high her skirt.
Where and why did this cover-up desire, almost universal and unique to our
species, originate?
Well, it could be that we miss that nice hairy coat we
wore for so many millennia which did have its flaws. It housed biting insects
and it hurt when you pinned medals on it. Back in 1972 the Welsh Elaine Morgan
with her Descent of Woman explained the aquatic ape theory that our branch of
the family, lead by women, spent so much time in and out of the Indian Ocean
that lapped eastern Africa that we gradually lost our hair, except for our heads
that spent the most time above water.
But then we had to migrate to colder Europe, Asia,
America et al. A selfish species, we robbed no end of animals of their coats
just to keep us warm and, when we invented pockets to carry things and sleeves
to wipe our noses, there was no stopping the fad that led to extremes and helped
make me a life-time skeptic.
I recall becoming a skeptic when I learned there was no
Santa Claus. Whom in this world could I trust? I was taught for a few years by
nuns. Most were hard working and dedicated but I doubted much of what they
labelled as truths when they told me we were created in God’s image. If so, why
would they hide almost every inch of their God-like bodies behind that hideous
garb? Did that not insult their creator? Today the main victims of such garb
are those who hide behind the eye-abusing blackouts of some of the Muslim world,
a fad that originated in 627 to imitate the wives of Muhammad. We can also
blame the Military or actually those who used the military to enhance their
power and wealth. Fancy uniforms provided status and hid the hardships,
suffering, and death that are so much a part of the career. They were also
useful in pinning on medals to which only the owners paid attention. Napoleon
had to order the addition of buttons to sleeves to discourage the habit soldiers
had of wiping their noses on uniform sleeves.
So, when the climate and duties are amenable what is
wrong with human nudity? Male lust, it is said, demands removing from sight
what titillates. Then why are cosmetics and suggestive clothing not also
universally banned? Some years ago a male acquaintance was overjoyed to get a
cashier job in a strip joint. Six months later I bumped in to him again so
asked about his job. He explained how, for the first 3 months, he was in heaven
but admitted he was a poor cashier as it meant taking his eyes off the naked
girls every few minutes. Then, slowly, the novelty wore off and being a cashier
became just a boring job with the girls a normal part of the background.
In this life we have so much to worry about what does it matter what is
on, or not on, the human body?